MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P52 Low and erratic exposure of oral acetaminophen in critically ill children determined with a <sup>14</sup>C microtracer study: a case for IV acetaminophen for acute pain management?

2019· article· en· W2945154505 on OpenAlexaff
Niina Kleiber, Elisa A. M. Calvier, M. G. Mooij, Ehj Krekels, W. H. Vaes, A. D. Windhorst, Harry Hendrikse, Dick Tibboel, Saskia N. de Wildt

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Disease in Childhood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBioavailabilityAcetaminophenDosingPharmacokineticsAnalgesicAntipyreticOral administrationMicroDoseNimesulidePopulationAnesthesiaPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Despite being the most commonly used analgesic and antipyretic, oral APAP bioavailability has not been determined in children. The aim of this study is to compare exposure after oral vs iv APAP using the PK data of the first pediatric oral bioavailability 14C microtracer study. Methods Design bioavailability microtracer population PK study Participants patients < 6 yrs old in the pediatric ICU who received 15 mg/kg iv APAP q6h Intervention a single microdose of 14CAPAP (3µg/kg) given orally at the same time as a therapeutic iv dose Data collection Blood was sampled 8 times up to 24 h post-dose Data analysis population PK analysis using NONMEM. Based on the model, exposure after oral vs iv was compared by simulating the concentration-time profiles and Css (targeted: 10 mg/L ± 20% deviation). 3 doses were simulated: 15 mg/kg q6h oral and iv and 22.5 mg/kg oral q6h. 1000 simulations were performed and the percentage of patients reaching the targeted mean Css of 10 mg/L±20% were compared. Results Oral bioavailibity was 72% (range:11–91%). After 15 mg/kg APAP, the median simulated oral Css was subtherapeutic (6.5 mg/L), but therapeutic (10 mg/L) for IV dosing (15 mg/kg). Patients were 2.5 times less likely to reach therapeutic plasma concentrations with 15 mg/kg oral vs iv APAP. With the maximal recommended oral doses of 22.5 mg/kg 6 h aimed to overcome the 72% bioavailability, median mean Css were therapeutic but overexposure and underexposure were more common than with iv (37 vs 32% Css< 8 mg/L and 30 vs 21% Css>12 mg/L). Conclusion Compared to IV, the usual (15 mg/kg) oral APAP doses result in low systemic exposure with subsequent risk of therapeutic failure. When oral doses are increased to overcome the low bioavailability, underdosing still occurs and overdosing was observed in patients with high bioavailability. IV APAP should therefore be preferred for acute pain management. Disclosure(s) Nothing to disclose

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Disease in ChildhoodSame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207