MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945162492 · doi:10.32316/hse-rhe.v31i1.4634

Bonds of Empire: The Formation of the National Federation of Canadian University Students, 1922–1929

2018· article· en· W2945162492 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nigel Roy Moses

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDominionPolitical scienceNational identityEmpireIdeologyEliteContext (archaeology)HumanitiesPoliticsSociologyMedia studiesLawHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The origins of the National Federation of Canadian University Students (NFCUS), Canada’s first secular, student council-based national student organization, are explored. The NFCUS originated in the internationalizing context of the Confédération internationale des étudiants and British concern for redefining and strengthening Dominion relations. The following events are examined: the 1924 Imperial Conference of Students, held in England; the 1926 imperial debating tour that promoted national student organizing; the 1926 Conference of Representatives; and the First Annual NFCUS Conference, held in 1927. The formative in- fluences on the NFCUS of the Student Christian Movement and pro-British Canadian university authorities are also examined. The NFCUS leaders held a narrow conception of the student interest and, moreover, were united by a pervasive and paradoxical imperial ideology that stressed both loyalty to the British Empire and a desire for Canadian national independence and identity. As such, the NFCUS was a highly political organization aligned with the university authorities, themselves associates of the British-Canadian elite. Résumé Cet article explore les origines de la Fédération nationale des étudiants universitaires canadiens (NFCUS), première organisation étudiante nationale et laïque au Canada. La NFCUS a vu le jour dans un contexte marqué par l’internationalisation de la Confédération internationale des étudiants et la volonté de la Grande-Bretagne de redéfinir et de renforcer les relations avec le Dominion. Parmi les événements ayant marqué la formation de la fédération, nous examinons : la conférence impériale des étudiants tenue en Angleterre en 1924; la tournée des débats impériaux de 1926 faisant la promotion de l’organisation nationale des étudiants; laConference of Representatives de 1926; ainsi que la première conférence annuelle de la NFCUS tenue en 1927. Nous explorons également de quelle manière le Student Christian Movement et les autorités universitaires britanniques canadiennes probritanniques ont influencé la formation NFCUS. Développant une conception étroite de l’intérêt des étudiants, les dirigeants de la NFCUS partageaient une idéologie impérialiste omniprésente et paradoxale qui insistait à la fois sur la loyauté envers l’Empire britannique et sur le sentiment d’indépendance et d’identité nationale canadienne. Ce faisant, la NFCUS était une organisation politique alignée sur les autorités universitaires, elles-mêmes associées à l’élite anglo-canadienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0340.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207