MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945180208 · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.031

Incision-Free Minimally Invasive Conjunctival Surgery (MICS) for Late-Onset Bleb Leaks After Trabeculectomy (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis)

2019· article· en· W2945180208 on OpenAlexaff
Neeru Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrabeculectomyMedicineBleb (medicine)SurgeryGlaucomaIntraocular pressureGlaucoma surgeryOphthalmologyLeak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This study describes an incision-free minimally invasive conjunctival surgical (MICS) technique to repair late-onset leaking blebs after trabeculectomy. METHODS: A surgical technique to repair leaking blebs without incision or excision of conjunctiva is described. This is followed by retrospective review of all patients treated at the Glaucoma Unit at St. Michael's Hospital for bleb leaks repaired with MICS from 2012 to 2017. With Research Ethics Board approval, clinical data obtained from the charts included demographic information, vision, intraocular pressure (IOP) data before and after surgery, need for additional medication, and complications. Resolution of the bleb leak without the need for additional therapy or intervention for glaucoma control was considered a success. RESULTS: The MICS approach was applied to 14 eyes of 13 consecutive patients with a leaking bleb. Mean age of presentation was 70.2 ± 14.8 years, and all patients had a history of mitomycin use at the time of glaucoma surgery. The onset of bleb leak following trabeculectomy ranged from 7 months to 16.3 years. Mean pre-operative IOP was 4.5 ± 2.8 mm Hg; IOP measured 12.3 ± 3.0 mm Hg immediately after the procedure. Complete resolution of the bleb leak was observed following surgery in all cases. The follow-up period ranged from 2 weeks to 61 months (10.2 ± 18.1). Recurrent bleb leak was reported in 1 patient 2 years following initial surgery. In all cases, the initially repaired filtering blebs remained functional at last follow-up, and no additional medications were required. CONCLUSIONS: The MICS procedure is an effective option for treating late-onset leaking blebs without cutting or excising conjunctival tissue. The minimal requirements of this method make it additionally accessible to low-resource settings. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of OphthalmologySame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207