Cyril Shelford, Gasoline, and the Politics of Free Enterprise in Postwar British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the politics of gasoline prices in British Columbia during the 1960s. It focuses on the “one-price” campaign of Cyril Shelford, a Social Credit member of the legislative assembly from the Omenica riding in the north. In 1963, Shelford forced Premier W.A.C. Bennett to appoint the Royal Commission on Gasoline Price Structure headed by Justice Charles Morrow. Over its sixty-seven days of hearings, the commission became a debate between two different, but overlapping, conceptions of free enterprise, a popular version built on fairness and opportunity for small producers and a more abstract and ostensibly depoliticized market idea preferred by the oil companies. While Shelford’s campaign attracted allies in the interior and the north, his goal of one wholesale price for gasoline faced considerable obstacles. The politics of knowledge at the commission hearings favoured the oil companies, while equal gasoline prices ultimately did not seem to fit the broader developmental politics of the Bennett government. Still, Shelford’s campaign and the Morrow commission point to the importance of oil politics outside producing areas like Alberta and to the social meaning of energy prices during the postwar boom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".