Processing of Superfine and Ultrafine Phosphate of a Phosphomud (Part Two)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mineral industries in common generate a lot of rejects in the form of fines and slimes, which ultimately create environmental and social problems besides causing losses of mineral values. In view of the recent stringent policy imposed on the environment, there is an urgent need to attempt possible simple and cheap solutions to such problems. These slimes have long been considered in the industry to be unrecoverable. It has been standard practice over many years in the phosphate industry to separate and discard the fines and ultrafine particles. In this respect, the present study shed light on the recovery of super and ultrafine phosphate of a phosphomud produced after the processing of an East Mediterranean phosphate ore. Falcon Concentrator model SB40-VFD (semi-continuous with variable frequency drive) was used in this study to recover the -32 micron phosphate fines of D50=11 micron. The effect of the main variables of the semi-continuous Falcon concentrator model SB40-VFD, including the bowl rotation frequency Hz, the fluidizing water pressure psi, and feeding rate g/min on the separation efficiency were followed up. In addition, two feeding modes based on a particle size-by-size were tried in this study: The sample was fed as a global -32 micron sample or as two fractions, -32+11 micron, and -11 micron samples. Central Composite Rotatable Design (CCRD) was applied on the Falcon separation of the -11 micron fraction with D50 < 3 micron alone to model and optimize the separation process for the two responses: the recovered phosphate grade and recovery. Results showed that the phosphate fines containing 14.73% P2O5, 15.03% acid insoluble, and 19.07% loss in ignition was recovered with grade and P2O5 recovery reaching 28.29%, and 95.97% in case of separating the overall -32 micron sample as one feed. In case of the fractionated feeding samples, the total grade and recovery reached 29.21%, and 88.42%, respectively. The application of the CCRD results showed that the bowl rotation frequency showed to have the main irreversible effect on the product grade, where the fluidizing water pressure had the main reversible effect on the recovery. On the other hand, feeding rate showed some effect on the product grade with almost no effect on its P2O5 recovery%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".