PERENCANAAN STRATEGIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI: Studi Kasus Pada Perguruan Tinggi Lepisi Tangerang
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Strategic plan IS/IT is an identification process portofolio application IS bases on computer that will support organization in execution of business plan and implement its business target. Strategy Planning IS/IT studies influence IS/IT to business performance and contribution for organization in selecting strategic steps. In other hand strategic plan IS/IT also explains various of toolses, technique and framework for manjemen to harmonize strategy IS/IT with business strategy, even prowl just pass by innovative technology implementation. In course of strategic plan IS/IT with object of LEPISI College research this, writer uses framework according to Jhon Ward and Peppard. Concept of idea from strategic plan IS/IT from Jhon Ward left from existence of invesment condition IS and TI in the past that less can give benefit for target of organization business, catch business opportunity, and existence of phenomenon growing of competitive excellence organization because can exploit potency IS and IT. Situation is referred can happen because strategic plan IS and TI that out of focus at business, conducted by part that less understand business opportunity, and make only strategy because technology need. The result of research this is the have the shape of proposal of strategy planning framework Information system that can be used at college LEPISI.
 Keyword: 
 Information system Strategic plan/Information Technology, Methodologies IS/IT
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it