Design of a centrifugal linear vibrating feeder driven by an eccentric motor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a novel linear vibrating feeder is designed that uses the centrifugal motion of an eccentric motor as the driving source. First, the working principle of the linear vibrating feeder is theoretically analyzed and the dynamic model is established. Subsequently, a dynamic simulation of the system is carried out using ANSYS software. The relationship between the displacement amplitude, vibration speed, and frequency of the linear vibrating feeder prototype is tested using a three-dimensional vibrometer, with an OT-10A copper terminal used to test the prototype. The experimental results indicate that, at a vibration frequency of 125 Hz, maximum vibration speeds of 1.23 and 1.70 mm/s are reached in the X- and Z-directions, respectively. The corresponding maximum amplitudes are 0.7 and 0.99 mm, and the material feeding speed reaches a maximum value of 123 mm/s. Compared with similar piezoelectric and electromagnetic vibrating feeders, the total weight of the prototype is reduced by a third, the noise is reduced by more than 20 dB, and the driving voltage is only 3.6 V. Hence, the performance of the linear vibrating feeder has been successfully demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".