Physical education in Primary Health Care: reports on interactive actions in an undergraduate course
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective this study was to describe experiences that reflect interactive actions in the program content of the Physical Education and Primary Health Care (PHC) course in the undergraduate (bachelor) degree in Physical Education at the Midwestern Parana State University (UNICENTRO). Activities that aimed to promote students’ understanding of the area and of their role in the health care team through interactions with other professors and professionals from the multidisciplinary residency with emphasis in family health for professionals of Physical Education, Nutrition, Nursing and Physical Therapy are described. The highlighted activities include a review of the legislation supporting the inclusion of the Physical Education professional in the PHC as well as documentaries based on previous reports from a professor in the area. Moreover, studies regarding the skills of the Physical Education professional in Primary Health Care, a comparison between the reality of Primary Health Care in Canada and the PHC, and the interventions developed by the multidisciplinary residents representing Physical Education. We hope this experience report facilitates continuous discussion about the teaching-learning process in the field of Physical Education and public/collective health, mainly in the field of Primary Health Care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".