Relationship between brachial and popliteal artery low-flow-mediated constriction in older adults: impact of aerobic fitness on vascular endothelial function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously observed that brachial artery (BA) low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC) is inversely related to aerobic fitness (i.e., V̇o2peak) in older adults (OA). However, it is unclear if an L-FMC response is elicited in the popliteal artery (POP) or if a similar inverse relationship with aerobic fitness exists. Considering that the POP experiences larger shear stress fluctuations during sedentary behaviors and traditional lower limb modes of aerobic exercise, we tested the hypotheses that 1) heterogeneous L-FMC responses exist between the BA versus POP of OA, and 2) that aerobic fitness will be inversely related to POP L-FMC. L-FMC was assessed in 47 healthy OA (30 women, 67 ± 5 yr) using duplex ultrasonography and quantified as the percent decrease in diameter (from baseline) during the last 30 s of a 5-min distal cuff occlusion period. When allometrically scaled to baseline diameter, the BA exhibited a greater L-FMC response than the POP (–1.3 ± 1.6 vs. –0.4 ± 1.6%; P = 0.03). Furthermore, L-FMC responses in the BA and POP were not correlated ( r = 0.22; P = 0.14). V̇o2peak was strongly correlated to POP L-FMC ( r = –0.73; P < 0.001). The heterogeneous BA versus POP L-FMC data indicate that upper limb L-FMC responses do not represent a systemic measure of endothelial-dependent vasoconstrictor capacity in OA. The strong association between V̇o2peak and POP L-FMC suggests that localized shear stress patterns, perhaps induced by lower limb dominant modes of aerobic exercise, may result in greater vasoconstrictor responsiveness in healthy OA. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We compared low-flow-mediated constriction responses between the brachial and popliteal arteries of healthy older adults. Vasoconstrictor responses were not correlated between arteries. A strong relationship between aerobic fitness and low-flow-mediated vasoconstriction was observed in the popliteal artery. These findings suggest that brachial vasoconstrictor responsiveness is not reflective of the popliteal artery, which is exposed to larger shear stress fluctuations during bouts of sedentary behavior and traditional lower limb modes of exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".