MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945469926 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2917699

6–18 GHz GaAs pHEMT Broadband Power Amplifier Based on Dual-Frequency Selective Impedance Matching Technique

2019· article· en· W2945469926 on OpenAlexaff
Hwiseob Lee, Wooseok Lee, Tae‐Wan Kim, Mohamed Helaoui, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi, Youngoo Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersSungkyunkwan University
KeywordsHigh-electron-mobility transistorAmplifierImpedance matchingCenter frequencyElectrical impedanceMonolithic microwave integrated circuitGallium arsenideBroadbandMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringBiasingFrequency bandOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceTransistorTelecommunicationsEngineeringVoltageCMOSBand-pass filterAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a broadband gallium-arsenide pseudomorphic high-electron-mobilitytransistor (GaAs pHEMT) power amplifier integrated circuit (PAIC) based on a dual-frequency selective impedance matching technique for warfare applications. For a broadband PA design, lower and upper-frequency corners where serious performance degradation is likely to occur should be carefully considered. Feedback and resistive biasing circuits were adopted for driver and main stages to making their frequency responses as flat as possible. Optimum impedances of not only extended lower and upper-frequency corners but also center frequency, were then extracted. Such dual-frequency selective impedance matching technique was applied for extended lower and upper-frequency corners while checking the mismatch level for the center frequency. The proposed broadband PAIC for frequency band from 6 to 18 GHz was designed using a 0.15 μm GaAs enhanced-mode pHEMT (E-pHEMT) process. The implemented broadband PAIC with a simple two-stage structure had a very small chip size of 1.19×0.82 mm2. It exhibited a power gain of more than 16.4 dB and output power of 19.2 dBm. Very flat characteristics in power gain and an output power within ±1.0 dB through the whole band were achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207