Dynamic response of soil–pile–structure system subjected to lateral spreading: shaking table test and parallel finite element simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the dynamic response of soil–pile–structure interaction (SPSI) system behind a quay wall in liquefiable soil and laterally spreading ground through both large-scale shaking table test and parallel finite element (FE) simulation. A three-dimensional (3D) nonlinear FE model is developed to simulate the target SPSI system using the parallel modeling technique with high computational efficiency. This FE model of the SPSI system is validated by the shaking table test results. The validated FE model is firstly used to further explore the dynamic behavior of the SPSI system with details on the global responses of the SPSI system and the local responses. Secondly, the validated FE model is used for global sensitivity analysis (GSA) to fully assess the effects of uncertain parameters on the interested dynamic responses of the SPSI system. The experimental and numerical investigations show that liquefaction-induced lateral spreading significantly affects the movement of the clay crust at the landside and the internal forces in piles behind the quay wall. GSA results show that the relative importance of system parameters depends on the dynamic responses of interest, while the interaction effects among system parameters on dynamic responses are not evident.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".