Relativistic mass due to a dilatant vacuum leads to a quantum reformulation of the relativistic kinetic energy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Relativistic mass change with speed is considered here as the effect of a viscous, dilatant vacuum, whose apparent viscosity is related to the Lorentz factor. Transient solid-like vacuum due to shear stress is presented as the reason why vacuum prevents the speed of massive objects from being indefinitely increased. Such a vacuum – that in a previous study allowed to exactly calculate the Pioneer anomaly, Mercury’s perihelion precession, and was shown to be compatible with stable planetary orbits – leads here to a quantum formula for the relativistic kinetic energy. A formula which distinguishes between the case of accelerated charges in a vacuum, for which a Stokes–Einstein radius comes into play, and the case of accelerated macroscopic bodies, for which the quantum potential term vanishes. In this way, incidentally, one obtains again correct results for the Pioneer 10, confirming the role of vacuum’s viscous force. This description of a quantum mechanism underlying the relativistic kinetic energy may be also helpful in constructing a theory of quantum relativity and may even tell us more about the interactions of matter with the Higgs field and the dark sector: two issues which can be themselves linked to a dilatant vacuum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".