Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article introduces readers to the publication archive of Our Lives: Canada’s First Black Women’s Newspaper , founded by the Black Women’s Collective in 1986 and housed within the digital collection of the Rise Up! Feminist Archive. By situating the publication Our Lives as a potential site for recuperating histories of Black feminist resistance, this article demonstrates the role that community or activist archives play in the preservation of collective history: combating institutional modes of erasure and challenging dominant historical narratives. It argues that there is a need for further examination of the pedagogical and ideological elements of activist archives and their contribution to social movements and archival practice. Rather than considering activist archives as relatives of traditional archival institutions, it suggests that these projects need to be examined as sites of active learning in the tradition of community-embedded experiments. Building on recent scholarship, it investigates the discursive continuity between archives and historical narratives, and it reconceptualizes the term archives to include alternative sites and materials for the reconstructing the stories of historically marginalized groups. Finally, the article argues that archival projects need to adapt to new forms of archival representation and contexts, allowing for shifts in traditional methods and definitions. RESUME Cet article amene les lecteurs a la rencontre des archives liees a la publication Our Lives: Canada’s First Black Women’s Newspaper, fonde par le Black Women’s Collective en 1986 et qui est heberge dans la collection numerique de Rise Up! Feminist Archive. En positionnant la publication Our Lives comme lieu potentiel de reappropriation des histoires de la resistance feministe noire, cet article demontre le role que les archives communautaires ou militantes jouent dans la preservation de l’histoire collective: elles luttent contre les modalites institutionnelles d’effacement et defient les discours historiques dominants. Il soutient qu’un examen plus pousse des elements pedagogiques et ideologiques des archives militantes et leur contribution aux mouvements sociaux et aux pratiques en archivistique est necessaire. Plutot que de considerer les archives militantes comme apparentees aux institutions d’archives traditionnelles, il suggere que ces projets doivent etre etudies comme des lieux d’apprentissage actif dans la lignee des experiences ancrees dans la communaute. S’appuyant sur les etudes recentes, il scrute les continuites narratives entre les archives et les discours historiques et reconceptualise le terme « archives » afin d’y integrer des lieux et des materiaux alternatifs pour rebâtir les histoires de groupes historiquement marginalise. Enfin, l’article soutient que les projets archivistiques doivent s’adapter a de nouvelles formes de representations et de contextes archivistiques, permettant ainsi de modifier les methodes et les definitions traditionnelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it