MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945577202 · doi:10.1080/15476286.2019.1616354

Role of a hairpin-stabilized pause in the<i>Escherichia coli thiC</i>riboswitch function

2019· article· en· W2945577202 on OpenAlexafffund
Adrien Chauvier, Jean‐François Nadon, Jonathan P. Grondin, Anne-Marie Lamontagne, Daniel A. Lafontaine

Bibliographic record

VenueRNA Biology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRiboswitchBiologyTranscription (linguistics)RNAEscherichia coliTranscriptional regulationComputational biologyGeneticsGeneCell biologyNon-coding RNAGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcriptional pauses have been reported in bacterial riboswitches and, in some cases, their specific positioning has been shown to be important for gene regulation. Here, we show that a hairpin structure in the Escherichia coli thiamin pyrophosphate (TPP) thiC riboswitch is involved in transcriptional pausing and ligand sensitivity. Using in vitro transcription kinetic experiments, we show that all three major transcriptional pauses in the thiC riboswitch are affected by NusA, a transcriptional factor known to stimulate hairpin-stabilized pauses. Using a truncated region of the riboswitch, we isolated the hairpin structure responsible for stabilization of the most upstream pause. Destabilization of this structure led to a weaker pause and a decreased NusA effect. In the context of the full-length riboswitch, this same mutation also led to a weaker pause, as well as a decreased TPP binding affinity. Our work suggests that RNA structures involved in transcriptional pausing in riboswitches are important for ligand sensitivity, most likely by increasing the time allowed to the ligand for binding to the riboswitch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRNA BiologySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207