Continuous renal replacement therapy is associated with acute cardiac stunning in critically ill patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Intermittent renal replacement therapy induces cardiac stunning in chronic hemodialysis and acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. In chronic hemodialysis, recurrent stunning contributes to heart failure and cardiac death, with ultrafiltration and intradialytic hypotension being the principal determinants of this injury. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), with its lower ultrafiltration rates and improved hemodynamic profile, should protect against cardiac stunning in AKI. The objective of this study was to assess whether CRRT is associated with cardiac stunning in critically ill patients with AKI. METHODS: We prospectively measured cardiac function using global and segmental longitudinal left ventricular strain using transthoracic echocardiography in 11 critically ill patients who were started on CRRT for AKI. We compared measurements at 4, 8, and 24 hours to baseline immediately prior to initiation of CRRT, with each patient serving as their own control. We also recorded blood pressure, heart rate, dose of vasoactive medications and intensive care unit mortality. FINDINGS: Ten of 11 patients developed new regional cardiac stunning, with 8/11 within 4 hours of starting CRRT, despite stable hemodynamics. The number of affected left ventricular segments varied from 1 to 11 (out of 12). The stunning occurred both in patients with preserved and impaired baseline cardiac function, and 7/11 patients died in the intensive care unit. DISCUSSION: Initiation of CRRT in critically ill patients with AKI is associated with cardiac stunning despite stable hemodynamics. This mechanism may explain lack of clinical benefit of CRRT over intermittent modalities and warrants further investigation to improve cardiovascular outcomes in critically ill patients with AKI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".