ВЛИЯНИЕ ЭНДОВАСКУЛЯРНЫХ ВМЕШАТЕЛЬСТВ НА КЛИНИЧЕСКОЕ ТЕЧЕНИЕ ПОСТИНФАРКТНОГО ПЕРИОДА У ПАЦИЕНТОВ МОЛОЖЕ 60 ЛЕТ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim. One of the major issues in modern cardiology is the treatment and prevention of complications in younger patients (under 60 years) after myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI). According to the available evidence, in female patients, endovascular interventions are less common, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery is more common than in male patients. Material and methods. The study included 102 male and female patients aged under 60 years and diagnosed with STEMI. In all participants, coronary angiography was performed within first 6 hours, followed by infarct-related artery revascularisation via balloon angioplasty and stenting. At Days 10–15, as well as 6 and 12 months later, clinical examination (presence of angina, heart failure, or arrhythmias), Holter ECG monitoring, and treadmill test were performed. Results. The results of the one-year follow-up suggested that in female patients, heart failure developed earlier, ejection fraction was significantly lower, and Functional Class II angina was more prevalent than in their male peers. Moreover, female patients more often demonstrated clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, reduced exercise capacity, and decreased heart rate variability. Conclusion. Post-infarction clinical course in women under 60 years was characterised by earlier development of heart failure, which justifies adequate control of its clinical manifestations and more aggressive therapy. The prevalence of effort angina or supraventricular extrasystolia was higher in women, which requires the antianginal therapy correction, via increasing the doses of β-adrenoblockers or calcium channel blockers. In men, ventricular arrhythmias were more prevalent, which might require antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".