MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945641928 · doi:10.1002/mds.27673

The Parkinson's disease e‐diary: Developing a clinical and research tool for the digital age

2019· article· en· W2945641928 on OpenAlexaff
Joaquín A. Vizcarra, Álvaro Sánchez‐Ferro, Walter Maetzler, Luca Marsili, Lucía Zavala, Anthony E. Lang, Pablo Martínez‐Martín, Tiago Mestre, Ralf Reilmann, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, E. Ray Dorsey, Serene S. Paul, Judith W. Dexheimer, Benjamin D. Wissel, Rebecca Fuller, Paolo Bonato, Ai Huey Tan, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Catherine Kopil, Margaret Daeschler, Lauren Bataille, Galit Kleiner, Jesse M. Cedarbaum, Jochen Klucken, Aristide Merola, Christopher G. Goetz, Glenn T. Stebbins, Alberto J. Espay

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement DisordersToronto Western HospitalOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaParkinson's Clinic of Eastern Toronto & Movement Disorders CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseContent (measure theory)DiseaseComputer scienceClinical neurologyMedicinePsychologyGerontologyWorld Wide WebNeurosciencePathologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207