MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2945651289 · doi:10.1101/638015

Multiplexed imaging of immune cells in staged multiple sclerosis lesions by mass cytometry

2019· preprint· en· W2945651289 on OpenAlexaff
Valeria Ramaglia, Salma Sheikh‐Mohamed, Karen Legg, Olga L. Rojas, Stéphanie Zandee, Fred Fu, Olga Ornatsky, Eric Swanson, Alexandre Prat, Trevor D. McKee, Jennifer L. Gommerman

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsFluidigm (Canada)University Health NetworkUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Toronto
FundersEMD SeronoMultiple Sclerosis SocietyNational Multiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisMass cytometryLesionPathologyPhenotypeImmune systemFlow cytometryCD8CellMicrogliaBiologyMedicineImmunologyInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is characterized by demyelinated and inflammatory lesions in the brain and spinal cord. Lesions contain immune cells with variable phenotypes and functions. Here we use imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to enable the simultaneous imaging of 15+ proteins within 11 staged MS lesions. Using this approach, we demonstrated that the majority of demyelinating macrophage-like cells in active lesions were derived from the resident microglial pool. Although CD8 + T cells predominantly infiltrated the lesions, CD4 + T cells were also abundant but localized closer to blood vessels. B cells with a predominant switched memory phenotype were enriched across all lesion stages and were found to preferentially infiltrate the tissue as compared to unswitched B cells which localized to the vasculature. We propose that IMC will enable a comprehensive analysis of single-cell phenotypes, their functional states and cell-cell interactions in relation to lesion morphometry and demyelinating activity in the MS brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→