MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945713183 · doi:10.1117/12.2523004

Possibility of an in situ gauge for PW relativistic intensities (Conference Presentation)

2019· article· en· W2945713183 on OpenAlexaff
L. Roso, J. A. Pérez-Hernández, Massimo De Marco, G. Gatti, W. T. Hill, Calvin He, R. Fedosejevs, Andrew Longman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsLaserThomson scatteringAtomic physicsIntensity (physics)Doppler effectMeasure (data warehouse)HarmonicsIonizationOpticsElectronPhotonHigh harmonic generationIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A technique to measure the intensity profile of a focused laser pulse at full power is a long-standing desire. High power lasers allow experiments at relativistic intensities (1018 W/cm2 and beyond). At those photon densities all atoms are ionized and therefore it is very difficult to measure directly the peak intensity or the 3D-profile of the focal spot intensity. We would like to present a way to measure it, based on residual atoms in the experimental chamber. A low-density gas will imply a number of atoms at the laser focal volume. Those atoms will be instantaneously ionized, and the released electrons will move at relativistic speeds driven by the laser field. Plasma effects, at low density, can be neglected, and electrons move independently driven only by the laser field. Nearly 50 years ago, an approach was suggested that is based on relativistic Thomson scattering, which consists of a rich spectrum of Doppler shifted radiation of the laser light, and its harmonics [1]. This reference provides very simple expressions for the scattered Doppler shift vs. intensity. Therefore, such scattered photons give very valuable information about the intensity profile. We propose to measure the Doppler shift of the low order harmonics as an in-situ direct measure of the intensity. In particular, we will present the first preliminary experimental observation of such a shift of the second harmonic as a non-destructive way to measure the intensity profile of the Salamanca VEGA-2 laser focal profile. The spectrum is consistent with a peak intensity beyond 1018 W/cm2, which correlates well with the expected intensity. This promising result is the theme of this presentation. Details of the experiment, numerical simulations, related experiments and prospects for exploiting relativistic Thomson scattering to develop an in situ intensity profiler will be discussed. [1] E. S. Sarachik and G. T. Schappert, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2738 (1970).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207