MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

5PSQ-011 Venous thromboembolic events and total hip or knee arthroplasty: incidence and associated factors

2019· article· en· W2945764188 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A Etangsale, B Kadri, C Balouzet, E Snobbert, Sophie Pargade, Sandra Camps

Bibliographic record

VenueSection 5: Patient safety and quality assurance · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)RivaroxabanDabigatranVenous thromboembolismArthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyMedical prescriptionInternal medicineSurgeryWarfarinThrombosisAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Orthopaedic surgery is associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism events (VTE), especially in total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The incidence of VTE with pharmacological prophylaxis after THA or TKA was 0.7%.1 Although this incidence is low, these adverse events are serious and usually preventable. Purpose The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of VTE and the factors associated with a VTE after THA or TKA. Material and methods To evaluate this incidence in 2017, the numerator (number of stays with VTE after THA or TKA) and the denominator (number of stays of patients hospitalised to THA or TKA) were obtained from diagnosis related groups (DRG) data. Some demographic and medical characteristics of stays were extracted from DRG data. Information related to the thromboprophylaxis were obtained by analysing prescriptions of the whole stays. The factors associated with a VTE were identified according to Fisher’s exact test. Results A total of 833 stays of THA and TKA were identified. The patients’ mean age was 72.2 years. The most common thromboprophylaxis was the use of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in postoperative and rivaroxaban over the following days. The incidence of VTE was 0.48%. The patients’ mean age with VTE was 74 years. The most common thromboprophylaxis was the use of LMWH in postoperative and dabigatran. In the study, any factors were not significantly associated with VTE (p>0.05). Conclusion In our study, the incidence was low. Our prescription software proposed protocols of thromboprophylaxis standardised according to patients’ characteristics, especially age. The prescriptions were always performed by senior physicians. The thromboprophylaxis recommendations were respected. This study did not find characteristics significantly associated with VTE. It could be interesting to perform a national study to identify the factors associated with VTE after THA or TKA. This will allow the establishment of corrective measures to improve patient care and share professional and organisational practices of hospitals with low incidence of VTE. References and/or acknowledgements 1. Senay A, et al. Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in 2372 knee and hip replacement patients after discharge: data from a thromboprophylaxis registry in Montreal, Canada. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2018; No conflict of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSection 5: Patient safety and quality assuranceSame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207