Kristina R. Llewellyn and Nicholas Ng-A-Fook, eds., Oral History and Education: Theories, Dilemmas, and Practices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here the author's reference to the ASSÉ as a feminist organization seems simplistic considering the feminist critiques of ASSÉ's structure and 'boys club' culture that he describes.In light of the author's in-depth attention to internal debates throughout the book, and a page dedicated to the 1969 Sir George Williams Affair, it is further disappointing that anti-racist and anti-colonial critiques, raised by ASSÉ's Social Struggles Committee, are here relegated to a footnote.If in the epilogue the author underlines concerns that the post-2012 critiques of the ASSÉ are leading to the demise of an organization so central to the movement, his monograph inadvertently seems to reveal a slightly different thesis: that the complex critiques and tendencies within Quebec's combative syndicalist tradition have rendered it both fragile and strong.Despite its inevitable omissions, including the lack of substantive explanation (beyond a footnote) of the functionalities of the financial aid system and of the general unlimited strikes referred to throughout, after reading this monograph one gains a deep understanding of the student movement and Quebec.A translation, should someone complete one, might need to clarify certain unexplained references to Quebec history.Within Quebec, the book provides an indispensable tool to student activists, and accomplishes its author's goal of inciting the reader to want to see, and even act upon, where this complex and fluctuating heritage will take us in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".