MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945805098 · doi:10.1097/cxa.0000000000000049

The Value of Hospitalization in the Opioid Epidemic: A Scoping Review

2019· review· en· W2945805098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Addiction · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsLakeridge HealthQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionMedicineOpioid use disorderEmergency departmentIntervention (counseling)Inclusion (mineral)Family medicinePsychiatryOpioidPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTRésumé Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a potentially chronic, relapsing condition associated with a great degree of morbidity and mortality. In Canada, OUD is at the forefront of the opioid epidemic, which has claimed more than 8000 lives between January 2016 and March 2018. As individuals with OUD are more likely to receive health services from the emergency department and acute hospitalizations, it makes logical sense for there to be a move toward improving the quality of hospital-based services. Hospitalization represents a golden opportunity to connect patients who have OUD with evidence-based treatments. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and offering of hospital-based interventions for individuals with OUD by way of a scoping review. Data sources: Five online databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Study selection: Randomized and nonrandomized intervention studies were considered eligible for inclusion in this scoping review. Results: Twenty two of 354 retrieved papers met inclusion criteria. Detoxification programs (n = 7), relapse prevention programs (n = 11), maternal–perinatal programs (n = 2), and combination programs (n = 2) were identified. Both interventions and outcome measures varied widely between studies, but the overall findings demonstrated the effectiveness of the interventions considered with regard to improved retention in treatment, reduction of illicit opioid use, and reduced hospital length of stay. Conclusions: The findings of our study demonstrate that there is a high degree of congruence between the effectiveness of interventions initiated in the community versus hospital-based treatments for individuals with OUD. Hospitalization represents a golden opportunity to connect patients who have OUD with evidence-based treatments. Contexte: Les troubles liés à l’usage d’opioïdes (TLUO) sont une affection potentiellement chronique et récurrente associée à un degré élevé de morbidité et de mortalité. Au Canada, TLUO figure au premier rang dans l’épidémie d’opioïdes. Elle a coÛté la vie à plus de 8 000 personnes entre janvier 2016 et mars 2018. Comme les personnes ayant cette maladie sont plus susceptibles de recevoir des soins du service des urgences et des hospitalisations en soins de courte durée, il est logique de progresser vers l’amélioration de la qualité des services hospitaliers. L’hospitalisation représente une occasion en or de mettre en relation les patients présentant une TLUO avec des traitements éprouvés. Objectifs: évaluer l’efficacité et l’offre d’interventions en milieu hospitalier pour les personnes atteintes de TLUO par le biais d’une étude de la portée des incidences. Sources de données: cinq bases de données en ligne ont été explorées conformément aux directives de PRISMA. Sélection de l’étude: les études d’intervention aléatoires et non aléatoires ont été considérées comme admissible à l’inscription dans cet examen exploratoire. Résultats: 22 des 354 études récupérés répondaient aux critères d’inclusion. Des programmes de désintoxication (n = 7), des programmes de prévention des rechutes (n = 11), des programmes maternels-périnataux (n = 2) et des programmes combinés (n = 2) ont été identifiés. Les interventions et les mesures de résultats variaient beaucoup d’une étude à l’autre, mais l’ensemble des résultats démontrait l’efficacité des interventions envisagées en ce qui concerne l’amélioration de la rétention du traitement, la réduction de la consommation d’opioïdes illicites et la réduction de la durée de séjour en hôpital. Conclusions: Les résultats de notre étude démontrent qu’il existe un degré élevé de congruence entre l’efficacité des interventions initiées dans la communauté et les traitements en milieu hospitalier pour les personnes atteintes de TLUO. L’hospitalisation représente une occasion en or de mettre en relation les patients présentant un TLUO avec des traitements éprouvés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it