Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction IN THE SECOND CHAPTER of Felicitas Hoppe's 2012 bogus autobiography- cum-travel novel, Hoppe , we learn how the biographical subject, “Hoppe,” encounters a historical German-Australian figure, the explorer and scientist Ludwig Leichhardt (1813–48?). The iconic Leichhardt is well known within Australian culture and has given his name to suburbs, streets, and more besides. Historian Darrell Lewis has even recently described him as one of the most famous mythical figures from the Australian past. In Germany, on the other hand, commemoration is muted and primarily located in Lusatia (Brandenburg) where Leichhardt was born and spent his early years. Though sometimes compared to Alexander von Humboldt, Leichhardt died young. In the words of one of the characters in Hoppe , he is the possessor of a quintessential “deutsche[r] Entdeckerschicksal des 19. Jahrhunderts” (nineteenthcentury German explorer's fate). In Australia, Leichhardt is famous for being the first European to travel, with Indigenous and non-Indigenous companions, from Moreton Bay (near present-day Brisbane) to Port Essington (in the Northern Territory). However he is also famous for completely disappearing—at least from non-Indigenous sight—on a later attempt to overland to the west coast of Australia, in what was an all but impossible mission through arid country. In Felicitas Hoppe's novel, the protagonist “Hoppe” is alerted to Leichhardt when the crew of the ship on which she is traveling from Canada to Australia give her a German edition of Leichhardt's 1847 Port Essington Journal. In Adelaide (South Australia), where “Hoppe” then spends a decade in the 1970s and 1980s going to school and studying music, she engages more deeply with this figure. This starts when she writes “das mittlerweile legendäre Buch L ” ( Hoppe , 135; the now legendary Book L ), a book that has never been published, if indeed the real Felicitas Hoppe ever did write it. The novel's extended gloss of Buch L indicates that “Hoppe” wrote it while inspired by the figures who went out searching for the missing German naturalist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".