MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945927324

Étude de cas ou protocole à cas unique

2018· article· fr· W2945927324 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Boudreau

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Qu'est-ce qui distingue une etude de cas ( en anglais: case study) d'un protocole de recherche a cas unique? Case study or single case research design? Any difference?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.704
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.767
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.7040.767
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.014
Scholarly communication0.0130.021
Open science0.0070.012
Research integrity0.0110.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex JournalSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207