O03 Allergy to penicillins in a pediatric population: reported vs true
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Reported allergy to penicillins is a major clinical problem. Over 10% of parents report drug allergy resulting in higher cost and less than optimum management of infectious diseases. Objectives To determine the relative likelihood of true allergy in patients suspected to have a penicillin allergy and to investigate the risk factors involved. We hypothesized that the vast majority of self-reported penicillin allergies are less likely to be true allergies when proper immunological work up is performed. Methods Paediatric patients aged 0–18 years presenting to the ADR clinic at the Children Hospital of Western Ontario (CHWO) with suspected antibiotic allergies were included. A retrospective review of charts was conducted to obtain demographic information and results from allergological and in vitro testing. Subjects were evaluated with a radioallergosorbent test (RAST) or the lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA)/the invitro platelet toxicity assay (iPTA) depending on whether the history was most consistent with an immediate allergy or a delayed hypersensitivity, respectively. Patients with negative RAST or LTA/iPTA were recommended to undergo confirmatory oral challenge test (OCT). Results Ninety subjects were identified including 75 with possible penicillin allergy and 10 with suspected allergy to a non-penicillin antibiotic. Five subjects presented with a mixed allergy. Based on the results from RAST, in vitro testing and OCTs, the prevalence of a true allergy in the penicillin group was 6.25% vs. 66.67% in the non-penicillin group (p< 0.001). Patients presenting with severe reactions were more likely to be truly allergic (p< 0.01). In-patients were more likely to present with non-penicillin allergies and were subsequently more likely to have a true allergy (p< 0.001). Conclusions True allergy is very rare in patients with suspected penicillin allergies and can be determined with a proper work-up including OCT. Shorter protocols for the evaluation of these patients would be beneficial. Disclosure(s) Nothing to disclose
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".