MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945962433 · doi:10.1101/gr.244830.118

Recompleting the <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> genome

2019· article· en· W2945962433 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Yoshimura, Kazuki Ichikawa, Massa J. Shoura, Karen L. Artiles, Idan Gabdank, Lamia Wahba, Cheryl L. Smith, Mark L. Edgley, Ann E. Rougvie, Andrew Fire, Shinichi Morishita, Erich M. Schwarz

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Food and AgricultureJapan Science and Technology CorporationNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentGordon and Betty Moore FoundationMichigan State UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyCaenorhabditis elegansGenomeGeneticsGeneCaenorhabditisGenomicsWhole genome sequencingSequence assemblyMulticellular organismComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Caenorhabditis elegans was the first multicellular eukaryotic genome sequenced to apparent completion. Although this assembly employed a standard C. elegans strain (N2), it used sequence data from several laboratories, with DNA propagated in bacteria and yeast. Thus, the N2 assembly has many differences from any C. elegans available today. To provide a more accurate C. elegans genome, we performed long-read assembly of VC2010, a modern strain derived from N2. Our VC2010 assembly has 99.98% identity to N2 but with an additional 1.8 Mb including tandem repeat expansions and genome duplications. For 116 structural discrepancies between N2 and VC2010, 97 structures matching VC2010 (84%) were also found in two outgroup strains, implying deficiencies in N2. Over 98% of N2 genes encoded unchanged products in VC2010; moreover, we predicted ≥53 new genes in VC2010. The recompleted genome of C. elegans should be a valuable resource for genetics, genomics, and systems biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations169
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome ResearchSame topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrench-language works237,207