Digital Communications and Society: Student Proceedings from the 2018 Canadian Communication Association Annual Conference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is our privilege to publish this special section of the current issue of Stream: Inspiring Critical Thought devoted to publishing the student proceedings from the Canadian Communication Association’s 2018 Conference at the Congress for the Social Science and Humanities held at the University of Regina. In its third year, these proceedings sought to provide a space for graduate students in communication studies across the country to publish their works. C’est un privilège pour nous de publier une section spéciale du numéro actuel de Stream: Inspiring Critical Thought, consacré à la publication des actes des communications étudiantes du colloque de l’Association canadienne des communications 2018, colloque organisé dans le cadre du Congrès des sciences humaines à l’Université de Régina. Pour une troisième année de suite, cette publication vise à fournir un espace aux étudiants et étudiantes de deuxième et troisième cycle en communication à travers le pays leur permettant de publier leurs travaux de recherche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.157 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".