Tailoring Electron-Photon Interaction in Active 3D Photonic-Crystal Architectures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A photonic-crystal is an artificially engineered periodic structure. It is often referred to as an “optical semiconductor” due to its unparallel capability to mold the flow-of-light on-chip, not only in plane (the x-y plane) but also along the third direction. Examples of the unique 3D control-of-light include diffraction less light-guiding, slow light, super prism, negative refraction and high-Q cavity. A new research frontier exists in which the concept of complete control-of-light is utilized to facilitate and maximize electron-photon interaction. The close proximity and strong interaction between a photonic-crystal and an electronic medium can lead to new optoelectronic properties not easily attainable by other means. In this program, we will study this new class of active photonic-crystal and to achieve improved device performances and basic discoveries. Under this program, the PI has made significant progress in the following areas: (i) We have maximized light trapping and absorption by a 3D simple-cubic photonic-crystal; By advancing the concept of simple-cubic symmetry design, we have successfully designed a super thin-film architecture for high efficiency, crystalline silicon solar cells; Most recently, we have provided a theoretical roadmap for thin-film silicon solar cells with 30% power conversion efficiency. (ii) In the modification of thermal radiation area, we have observed quasi- optical coherence in thermal radiation from a 3D metallic photonic-crystal; Furthermore, we have made a direct confirmation of super-Planckian radiation a tungsten photonic-crystal; (iii) We have made simultaneous observation of a large light diffraction-efficiency, 82%, and efficiency enhancement by a volume hologram material (PQ-PMMA) for solar concentration application. (iv) we have also successfully fabricated a 3D metal-oxide photonic crystal. We demonstrated that this TiO2 photonic crystal can achieve an effectively infinite optical path-length created using a simple-cubic photonic crystal for extreme light trapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".