MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946090562 · doi:10.1063/1.5086491

A fast and accurate piezoelectric actuator modeling method based on truncated least squares support vector regression

2019· article· en· W2946090562 on OpenAlexaff
Xiangdong Liu, Zhibiao Ma, Xuefei Mao, Jinjun Shan, Yijun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersBeijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young ScholarsNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSupport vector machineRobustness (evolution)Particle swarm optimizationLeast squares support vector machineComputer scienceLeast-squares function approximationRedundancy (engineering)AlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to improve the applicability of piezoelectric actuators (PEAs) in precision positioning, least squares support vector regression (LS-SVR) is applied to model hysteresis in PEAs due to its high modeling accuracy and fast convergence speed. However, low robustness of LS-SVR makes modeling accuracy susceptible to noises, which makes LS-SVR hysteresis models difficult to be applied in engineering environment. In this article, a robust truncated least squares support vector regression (T-LSSVR) is proposed. With the truncation strategy, redundancy in the training set is reduced and robustness is improved. Parameters required for T-LSSVR are optimized by particle swarm optimization and cross optimization algorithms. To test the proposed approach, it is applied to predict the hysteresis of PEAs. Results show that the proposed method is more accurate and robust than other versions of LS-SVR when the training set is polluted by noises, and meanwhile reduces the sample size and increases computational efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicPiezoelectric Actuators and ControlFrench-language works237,207