MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946190357 · doi:10.1111/jnc.14723

Alterations in synaptic function and plasticity in Huntington disease

2019· review· en· W2946190357 on OpenAlexafffund
Amy Smith-Dijak, Marja D. Sepers, Lynn A. Raymond

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuroscienceNeurotransmissionSynaptic plasticityHuntingtinHuntington's diseaseBiologyDopamineMetaplasticityNeurodegenerationHippocampusStriatumNeurotrophic factorsPsychologyDiseaseMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Huntington disease (HD) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder caused by an expansion of the CAG repeat region in the first exon of the huntingtin gene. Neurodegeneration, which begins in the striatum and then spreads to other brain areas, is preceded by dysfunction in multiple aspects of neurotransmission across a variety of brain areas. This review will provide an overview of the neurochemical mediators and modulators of synaptic transmission that are disrupted in HD. This includes classical neurotransmitters like glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid, modulators such as dopamine, adenosine and endocannabinoids, and molecules like brain-derived neurotrophic factor which affect neurotransmission in a more indirect manner. Alterations in the functioning of these signaling pathways can occur across multiple brain regions such as striatum, cortex and hippocampus, and affect transmission and plasticity at the synapses within these regions, which may ultimately change behaviour and contribute to the pathophysiology of HD. The current state of knowledge in this area has already yielded useful information about the causes of synaptic dysfunction and selective cell death. A full understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of disruptions in synaptic function and plasticity will lend insight into the development of the symptoms of HD, and potential drug targets for ameliorating them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations185
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207