Perception of Preparedness of Health Care Professionals in Case of a Nuclear, Chemical, Biological Attack/Emergency in a Tertiary Care Hospital
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background With the growth of global terrorism and rapid advancements in the field of science, the threat of a nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) attack remains imminent. This study assesses perceptions of preparedness of health care professionals in case of an NBC attack/incident in a tertiary care hospital. Patients and methods We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional study of 200 health care workers (including nurses and doctors) in a tertiary care hospital, from October 2018 through December 2018. Participants answered 17 yes/no questions and five 5-point Likert scale questions. We analyzed the data using chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance. Results Most participants (73.6%) reported availability to an isolation facility, and a majority of participants (72%) reported they had access to ventilators. Approximately 60% of participants reported they had access to beds, and 44.6% reported access to a laundry facility. Most participants (65.3%) knew of an employee assistance program while 31.1% did not know about such a program at their institution. More than 50% of the respondents think they can deal with an emergency involving an NBC attack while 60% of the respondents did not think that their institution would be able to protect them in the event of an NBC attack/incident. Overall, the participants were not adequately prepared for a mass scale NBC incident. The level of preparation was linked to the number of courses and training programs completed by the participants, with postgraduate medical personnel having the maximum level of preparedness, followed by medical graduates and nursing personnel. Conclusion Given the inadequate level of preparedness for an NBC incident as indicated by our findings, drills and seminars on large-scale emergencies such as an NBC attack should be included in the curriculum of undergraduate medical and nursing students in order to impart them the necessary training and confidence in dealing with an NBC incident.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it