Impact of a Novel Cryoprotectant Blend on the Sensory Quality of Frozen Lobster ( <i>Homarus americanus</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frozen storage of lobster meat (Homarus americanus) can result in undesirable quality changes that decrease consumer acceptability of these products. Current seafood industry methods use cryoprotective agents that contain phosphates including sodium tripolyphosphates (STPP). However, recent evidence suggests that cryoprotective mixtures that combine different carbohydrates and STPP can have equal or even greater cryoprotective properties compared to using STPP alone. The objective of this study was to compare the overall consumer acceptability of lobster meat stored for 6 months in different blends of these cryoprotective solutions. One hundred and seven panelists were recruited to score the acceptability of the lobster samples using nine-point hedonic scales. A check-all-that-apply (CATA) question containing 27 literature-informed, sensory descriptors was also used to identify terms frequently used to describe lobster meat. Analysis of variance analysis, indicated a significant increase for overall liking (22.1%, P < 0.0001), liking of flavor (23.6%, P < 0.0001) and texture (15.6%, P = 0.000) scores for samples stored in a novel carbohydrate blend plus sodium chloride (NaCl) and STPP compared to the water control. Subsequent penalty analysis revealed that overall liking scores were most positively associated with the attributes tender, sweet, moist and soft. Moreover, the attributes with the highest positive mean impact were more frequently used to describe lobster samples stored in solutions containing NaCl and the novel carbohydrate blend, as well as NaCl and STPP (Lobster-3 and Lobster-5 samples, respectively). PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The positive impact on the sensory quality of this novel blend of cryoprotective compounds (carbohydrates and NaCl) is proof of concept that this mixture is comparable, if not better than preservatives currently used by the seafood industry. Given the necessary regulatory approval and industry acceptance, lobster processors may consider this novel blend as a suitable alternative to freeze lobster products for up to 6 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".