MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946536093

Lefthanders advantages in handball - Negative frequency effects depend on familarity of throwing patterns

2013· article· en· W2946536093 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Steingroever, Florian Loffing, Norbert Hagemann, Joseph Baker, Jörg Schorer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrowingPsychologyMovement (music)Cognitive psychologyTest (biology)Contrast (vision)Social psychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of a lefties’ advantage in interactive sports can best be explained by negative frequency-dependent effects (Hagemann, 2009) assuming that the greater frequency of situations with right-handed opponents makes it possible to discriminate and predict a right-handed opponent’s movement more precisely. A study by Schorer, Baker, Fath & Jaitner (2007) demonstrated that expert players are capable of using strategically varying movement patterns in contrast to advanced players who use stable movement patterns. Novices, however, show a high variability in their movement patterns. The aim of our study was to test whether negative frequency-dependent effects occur only against advanced players and not versus experts or novices. Video stimuli were taken from a study of Schorer and colleagues (2007). To receive videos of the same quality of right- and left-handed throwers, videos were flipped vertically. The video sequences were presented to three participant groups (goalkeepers performing on a national level of competition, on a regional level of competition and p.e. students) on a computer screen and participants were instructed to predict the direction of the throw. We conducted a four factorial analysis of variance design with expertise of goalkeepers (experts, advanced, and novice goalkeepers) as between-subject and expertise of throwers (experts, advanced, and novice thrower), temporal occlusion conditions and laterality of presented throwers as within-subject factors. Results indicated the expected differences between left- and right-handed presented throwers as well as its interaction with various other factors. Results indicate that negative frequency effects depend on viewer’s familiarity with the throwing patterns displayed.Acknowledgments: Hagemann, N. (2009). The advantage of being left-handed in interactive sports. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 1641-1648. Schorer, J., Baker, J., Fath, F. & Jaitner, T. (2007). Identification of interindividual and intraindividual movement patterns in handball players of varying expertise levels. Journal of motor behavior, 39(5), 409-421.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceFrench-language works237,207