MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946670564 · doi:10.1063/1.5092975

Efficient calculation of X-ray absorption spectra using Chebyshev-Slepian filter diagonalisation

2019· article· en· W2946670564 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon P. Neville, Michael S. Schuurman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChebyshev filterSpectral lineFilter (signal processing)Absorption (acoustics)X-rayMathematicsComputational physicsPhysicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceMathematical analysisOpticsQuantum mechanicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficient, yet accurate, simulation of X-ray absorption spectra represents a significant challenge for ab initio electronic structure methods. Conventional approaches involve the explicit calculation of all core-excited states spanning the energy range of interest, even though only a small number of these states will contribute appreciably to the spectrum. We here report a different approach, based on a time-independent Chebyshev filter diagonalization scheme, which allows for the X-ray absorption spectrum to be computed without the explicit calculation of the core-excited eigenstates. Furthermore, in a subsequent postprocessing calculation, selected peaks may be analyzed via the calculation of natural transition orbitals, if desired. The scheme presented here is based on a refinement of the time-independent Chebyshev filter diagonalization approach. Previous formulations of this method have been characterized by a requirement for significant "user input" via the (sometimes unintuitive) tuning of various numerical parameters. To circumvent this, we introduce a new class of filters based on discrete prolate spheroidal sequences. We demonstrate that the resulting method, which we term Chebyshev-Slepian filter diagonalization, makes filter diagonalization essentially a black-box procedure. The Chebyshev-Slepian filter diagonalization method is implemented at the second-order algebraic diagrammatic construction level of theory and validated through the calculation of the X-ray absorption spectra of trifluoroacetonitrile and 1,4-benzoquinone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyFrench-language works237,207