Marking mosquitoes in their natural larval sites using <sup>2</sup>H‐enriched water: A promising approach for tracking over extended temporal and spatial scales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tracking mosquitoes using current methods of mark–release–recapture are limited to small spatial and temporal scales exposing major gaps in understanding long‐range movements and extended survival. Novel approaches to track mosquitoes may yield fresh insights into their biology which improves intervention activities to reduce disease transmission. Stable isotope enrichment of natural mosquito breeding sites allows large‐scale marking of wild mosquitoes absent human handling. Mosquito larvae that develop in 2 H‐enriched water are expected to be detectable for over 4 months using tissue mass fraction 2 H measurements, providing opportunities for long‐term mark–capture studies on a large scale. A laboratory study followed by a field experiment of mosquito larval habitat 2 H enrichment was conducted in Mali, to evaluate potential labelling of wild mosquitoes. Twelve natural larval sites were enriched using [ 2 H] deuterium oxide (D 2 O, 99%). Enrichment level was maintained by supplementation following dilution by rains. Availability of 2 H to mosquito larvae was enhanced by locally collected and cultured microorganisms (i.e. protozoa, algae and bacteria) reared in deuterated water, and provided as larval diet. Putative natural predators were removed from the larval sites and first instar larvae Anopheles gambiae s.l. larvae were added every other day. Emergence traps enabled collection of eclosing adults. Adult mosquitoes were kept at laboratory conditions for analysis of label attrition with age. Deuterium enrichment of wild mosquitoes above background levels (maximum = 143.1 ppm) became apparent 5–6 days after initial exposure, after which 2 H values increased steadily until c. 24 days later (to a mean of c. 220 ppm). Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes showed significantly different 2 H values (211 and 194.2 ppm, respectively). Both genera exhibited exponential label attrition ( e (‐x) ) amounting to 21.6% by day 30 post‐emergence, after which attrition rate continuously decreased. Males of both taxa exhibited a higher mean 2 H value compared to females. Deuterium oxide proved useful in marking mosquitoes in their natural larval sites and although costly, may prove valuable for studies of mosquitoes and other aquatic insects. Based on our field study, we provide a protocol for marking mosquito larval sites using deuterium oxide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".