MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946690697 · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5745

Optimal integral minus proportional derivative controller design by evolutionary algorithm for thermal‐renewable energy‐hybrid power systems

2019· article· en· W2946690697 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Renewable Power Generation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFrequency Control in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyControl theory (sociology)Derivative (finance)Controller (irrigation)Electric power systemComputer sciencePower (physics)MathematicsMathematical optimizationAlgorithmEngineeringControl (management)PhysicsElectrical engineeringThermodynamicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this work is to investigate the application of integral minus proportional derivative (IPD) controller for the automatic generation control (AGC) problem comprising of a two‐area thermal system integrated with renewable energy (RE)‐based sources such as wind, solar and fuel cells. In order to facilitate a realistic environment, each thermal system is equipped with a governor dead band, reheat turbine and generation rate constraint. Moreover, each RE‐based power system is modelled by incorporating certain drift and random variations as the key characteristic of RE‐based sources. The control performance of IPD is compared with the PID and PI controllers all tuned using an evolutionary technique genetic algorithm by incorporating a step load perturbation in both areas. In order to verify the effectiveness of the control scheme, detailed performance investigations are carried out using random variations in load perturbations and in RE‐based power. In addition, sensitivity analysis is also included for wider variations in system parameters in order to test robustness. Based on the extensive simulations for robustness and accuracy, it was observed that IPD outperforms the other controllers and therefore serves as a promising solution to the problem of AGC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it