Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kebijakan Dividen Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI 2011-2015)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dengan Kebijakan Dividen Sebagai variable Intervening. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif menggunakan sampel sebanyak 20 perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dipilih dengan menggunakan purposive sampling. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis jalur (Path Analisis) dengan menggunakan program AMOS versi 22. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Kepemilikan Manajerial berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap Price to Book Value (PBV), kepemilikan Manajerial berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap Dividend Payout Ratio (DPR) dan Dividend Payout Ratio (DPR) berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap Price to Book Value (PBV). Selanjutnya dapat dibuktikan bahwa Kepemilikan Manajerial berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap Price to Book Value (PBV) dengan Dividend Payout Ratio (DPR) sebagai variable mediasi. Kata Kunci: Struktur Kepemilikan (Kepemilikan Manajerial), Kebijakan Dividen (DPR), Nilai Perusahaan (PBV).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".