An Ensemble Learning-Based Vehicle Steering Detector Using Smartphones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to easy access to smartphones, recent years have witnessed an increasing interest in using the mobile phone as a sensing and computation platform for vehicle steering detection. However, relatively lower accuracy of smartphone sensors than on-board diagnostic (OBD)-based systems often leads to lower accuracy. We propose an ensemble learning-based model combined with the heuristic algorithm for smartphone-based vehicle steering detection in this paper. Ensemble learning has been widely recognized for its powerful generalization capability, high accuracy, and rapid convergence. However, applying the ensemble learning approach to steering detection of the smartphone-based vehicle entails many challenges due to the limitation of smartphone storage, the constraint on power consumption, and the requirement of being real-time. To address these challenges, we propose a series of techniques to reduce the complexity of the model and energy consumption, while at the same time maintaining high detection accuracy. The performance of the proposed system has been demonstrated using a real dataset and can achieve an accuracy of 97.37%. We also conduct two case studies on real road environment in Beijing with different smartphones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it