Bifurcation and stability analysis of stagnation points for an asymmetric peristaltic transport
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the streamline topologies and stability of stagnation points and their bifurcations for an asymmetric peristaltic flow. The asymmetry of channel is due to the propagation of peristaltic waves with different phases and amplitudes on the flexible channel walls. An exact analytic solution of the flow problem subject to the constraints of low Reynolds number and long wavelength is obtained in wave frame of reference moving with wave velocity. A system of nonlinear differential equations is established to locate and classify the stagnation points in the flow domain. Different flow situations, manifested in the flow field, are categorized as: backward flow, trapping, and augmented flow. The transition from one situation to the other corresponds to bifurcation, which is explored graphically through local and global bifurcation diagrams. This analysis discloses the stability status of stagnation points and ranges of involved parameters in which various flow conditions appear in the flow field. It is concluded that the trapping in an asymmetric peristaltic transport can be reduced by increasing the phase difference of the channel walls. It is also found that the augmented flow region shrinks and the trapping region expands by increasing the amplitude ratio of the channel walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".