MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2946864773 · doi:10.1186/s13102-019-0120-1

Effects of a tailored strength training program of the upper limb combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in chronic stroke patients: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial

2019· article· en· W2946864773 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie-Hélène Milot, Stephania Palimeris, Hélène Corriveau, François Tremblay, Marie‐Hélène Boudrias

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaMcGill UniversityJewish Rehabilitation HospitalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFondation Brain CanadaCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
KeywordsTranscranial direct-current stimulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationTranscranial magnetic stimulationStroke (engine)MedicinePhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialCorticospinal tractChronic strokeBrain stimulationRehabilitationClinical trialStimulationInternal medicineDiffusion MRIMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation→Same topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies→French-language works237,207→