Safety profile of INT230-6, a novel intratumoral (IT) formulation, during injections into a variety of refractory deep and superficial tumors with evidence of tumor regression and immune activation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2602 Background: INT230-6 is comprised of cisplatin (CIS), vinblastine (VIN) and an amphiphilic penetration enhancer which facilitates dispersion throughout tumors and diffusion into cancer cells. In preclinical experiments, INT230-6 led to necrosis and recruitment of immune cells with high rates of complete responses of injected and bystander tumors. This abstract highlights the safety and early pharmacodynamic activity of this approach. Methods: Patients with solid tumors that progressed on all standard treatments were enrolled. Dose escalation occurred by increasing number of tumors injected, loading per tumor, and total dose. INT230-6 was injected once every 2 weeks in multiple lesions for 5 sessions. Patients were monitored for safety and tolerability weekly. Pharmacokinetic(Pk) samples and peripheral blood were collected for flow cytometry and circulating cytokines. Pre and on study biopsies are ongoing. Results: 28 patients (14 unique cancer types) receiving a median of 3 prior treatments were enrolled. Doses from 0.3 ml up to-80 ml of INT230-6 were given into single lesions with some patients receiving a total of 120 mL ( = 9.7mg VIN exceeding the IV VIN dose) without significant systemic absorption or typical cytotoxic adverse events. Pk analysis suggests that systemic exposure of VIN or CIS is ~10% of injected. No DLT’s or drug-related SAE’s reported. The most frequent adverse event was grade 1 or 2 pain at injected site. Superficial tumors showed signs of response including flattening, areas of necrosis and ulceration. Tumor reduction, apparent in in both injected and bystander tumors, may indicate an abscopal effect. An increase > 30% in CD8 T-cells was seen in the blood of 3/9 evaluable patients. Conclusions: INT230-6 was safe and well tolerated in > 100 injections (28 patients) with encouraging activity and pharmacodynamic effects in advanced refractory tumors. Additional analysis of immune cells from on study biopsies will be presented. A new cohort will evaluate combination with an anti-PD1 antibody to understand if local tumor destruction can increase systemic antigen load, increase immune cell recognition and initiate a systemic immune response. Clinical trial information: NCT 03058289.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".