Impaired cardiac autonomic response in lung transplant patients: A retrospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac autonomic dysfunction (AD) is associated with adverse prognosis in lung disease; however, its implications in lung transplantation have not been previously described. This study evaluated the prevalence of AD in lung transplant (LTx) candidates, its determinants, prognostic implications, and prevalence post-transplant. METHODS: Retrospective one-year study of 103 LTx candidates with AD assessed using heart rate (HR) from the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Impaired chronotropic response index (CRI) was defined as <80% age-adjusted HR during 6MWT. Abnormal HR recovery (HRR) was categorized as reduction in HR ≤ 12 beats/minute after the first minute of 6MWT cessation. RESULTS: Abnormal CRI and HRR were observed in 94% and 76% of patients, respectively. A lower CRI was associated with obstructive lung disease and lower estimated aerobic capacity. CRI was independently associated with 6MW distance [12 m per 10% CRI, P = 0.03], but not with post-transplant cardiovascular events, hospital stay, or one-year mortality. At 3 months post-transplant, no improvement was observed in CRI (99%, n = 66/67, P = 0.25) or HRR (88%, n = 36/41, P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Cardiac AD was prevalent in LTx candidates and recipients, with chronotropic incompetence a modest contributor to exercise intolerance pretransplant. Further study may help determine whether direct autonomic measures such as HR variability may be more prognostic of LTx outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | high |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".