MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946985007 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.137

138 HINIC: Hand Hygiene – Improving NICU Infection Control

2019· article· en· W2946985007 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sachin Vidur Pasricha, Chantal R. Valiquette, Megan Singh, Rohini Pasricha, Darwin Jimal, Faiza Khurshid

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPediatric health and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueen (butterfly)HygieneMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reducing nosocomial infections in hospitals is important. The complex environment of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) demands an extra Moment of Hand Hygiene as implemented by Public Health Ontario. As such, precautionary measures surrounding hand hygiene have been implemented, including a bare-below-the-elbow (BBE) guideline and the moments of hand hygiene (MHH). We sought out to observe adherence and identify barriers to adherence to the MHH and BBE guidelines in the NICU. This is a cross-sectional study that took place from March through August 2018 in the NICU. We observed adherence to the MHH and BBE guidelines for 24 one-hour shifts. We describe adherence overall, as well as stratified by the moment, the body part (i.e. finger, hand, wrist, and forearm), the type of participant (e.g. doctor, nurse, family member) and the time of day (e.g. day vs. night shift). Subsequently, we administered online and in-person questionnaires to healthcare providers and patient families, respectively, to assess knowledge of these guidelines and barriers to adherence. We found Moments 1A and 2 least often adhered to (51% and 50%, respectively). We found forearm violations the most common BBE violation (56% adherence rate). 24 healthcare providers completed the questionnaire. 18/24 (75%), 16/24 (67%), and 16/24 (67%) agreed or strongly agreed that skin irritation, forgetfulness, and the busy NICU environment are barriers to adhering to the MHH. 15/23 (65%) and 13/23 (57%) agreed or strongly agreed that forgetfulness and the lack of a secure location to store jewellery and other valuables are barriers to adhering to the BBE guideline. 27 family members completed the questionnaire, of which 25 (93%), 24 (89%), 23 (85%), and 23 (85%) agreed or strongly agreed that hand hygiene equipment is available at the NICU, bedside, well labeled, and is constantly filled, respectively. There is a variation in adherence to the various MHH and the BBE guidelines when stratified by moment and by body part. Patient familes and healthcare providers have differing opinions on barriers to adherence. Families noted few barrier while healthcare providers commonly identified time constraints, the busy NICU environment, forgetfulness, skin irritation, lack of a secure location to secure jewellery, and patient family members not being comfortable commenting as potential barriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicPediatric health and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207