MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947021211 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2919283

Development and Characterization of a Non-Intrusive Sensor to Measure Wear in Centrifugal Pumps

2019· article· en· W2947021211 on OpenAlexafffund
Bryan Bohn, Ramin Khoie, R. Bhushan Gopaluni, James A. Olson, Boris Stoeber

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFPInnovationsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsImpellerElectromagnetic coilAcousticsCentrifugal pumpMaterials scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Magnetic reluctanceMagnetic fluxElectrical engineeringEngineeringMagnetic fieldMechanical engineeringMagnetPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A magnetic sensor is designed and fabricated that allows for impeller blade wear measurement while a centrifugal pump is in operation. The sensor can be installed on existing pumps and does not require structural modification. Over time, as the pump impeller erodes, the gap between the impeller and the pump side plate increases from an unworn width of 0.65 to 2.50 mm, the maximum allowable wear on the testbed pump used for experimental validation. The extent of the impeller wear is determined by measuring over time the change in the reluctance of a magnetic circuit passing through the eroding area. The sensor flux guide mechanism has a relative magnetic permeability of 10000. Flux through the circuit is driven by an inductive coil excited with a 1.0 V AC voltage signal at 70 Hz. As wear occurs, the impeller gap grows and the total reluctance of the magnetic circuit increases, which causes the peak inductance of the coil to drop. Trial data is collected at sampling frequencies up to 500 kHz and then assessed in the frequency domain using fast Fourier transform (FFT). The amplitude of the FFT signal at the pump's rotational frequency is then considered to estimate wear. Sampling data for 1 s at 500 kHz, the sensor demonstrates a maximum signal-to-noise ratio of 17.8 dB with an average sensitivity of 0.022 mV/mm and a resolution of 0.38 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207