Acute pulmonary and splenic response in an <i>in vivo</i> model of whole-body low-dose X-radiation exposure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Diagnostic radiation is an important part of patient care in the Intensive Care Unit; however, there is little data on the acute effects of exposure to these doses. We investigated pulmonary and splenic response 30 minutes, 4 hours or 24 hours after exposure to 2 mGy, 20 mGy, 200 mGy or 4 Gy whole-body X-radiation in a Sprague Dawley rat model.Materials and methods: Lung injury was assessed via respiratory mechanics, pulmonary edema, cellular, and proteinaceous fluid infiltrate and protein expression of oxidative stress markers. The radiation effect on the spleen was determined via proliferation, apoptosis and protein expression of oxidative stress markers.Results: All measurements of the lung did not differ from sham animals except for an increase in catalase after high dose exposure. Stimulated splenocyte proliferation increased after sham and low dose exposure, did not change after 200 mGy exposure and was significantly lower after 4 Gy exposure. The number of apoptotic cells increased 4 hours after 4 Gy exposure. There were fewer apoptotic cells after low dose exposure compared to sham. Both catalase and MnSOD were increased after 4 Gy exposure.Conclusion: There was no measured effect on pulmonary function while there was an impact to the spleen after low and high dose exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".