MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2947118124 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.129

130 Survival, Short-Term Morbidity of Extremely Low Gestational Age Infants and their Predictors

2019· article· en· W2947118124 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hannah Kis, Brigitte Lemyre, Aleksandar Radonjic, Jana Feberova

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)MedicineGestational agePediatricsPregnancyBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite advances in neonatal care for extremely low gestational age (ELGA) infants, they experience high rates of mortality and morbidity. Local data on survival, predictors, and outcomes of ELGA infants is crucial in order to provide accurate antenatal counseling. To determine the survival and morbidities of ELGA infants in our region stratified by gestational age. We performed a retrospective cohort study of infants born at <26 weeks gestational age who received intensive care at two level III Neonatal Intensive Care Units between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2017. We excluded stillbirths and infants who received only palliative care from birth. Outcomes included survival to discharge home (or transfer to another center), length of admission, and the following short-term morbidities: intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade III – IV, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) Bell’s Stage ≥2, late-onset sepsis, and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to analyze three factors identified as significant (p<.05) on univariate analysis. 117 infants were included: 8 infants at 22 weeks, 20 at 23 weeks, 38 at 24 weeks, and 51 at 25 weeks. The rates of survival were 37.5%, 50.0%, 68.4%, and 76.5% at 22, 23, 24, and 25 weeks, respectively. The probability of survival was similar for infants born at 22 and 23 weeks GA and significantly lower than for infants born at 24 and 25 weeks (fig.1). The mean (±SD) length of stay in the NICU was 114.6 ± 33.7 days. The overall prevalence of short-term morbidities was 25.9% for IVH grade III – IV, 5.4% for PVL, 89.9% for BPD, 16.1% for NEC, 40.0% for late-onset sepsis, and 19.3% for ROP requiring treatment. Only 2.7% of infants who survived ≥36 weeks (post-menstrual age) had no short-term morbidities. The multivariable regression analysis demonstrated: an increased risk of mortality for every 100g decrease in birth weight (OR=1.97; 95% CI: 1.40 – 1.98; p =.02), an increased risk of mortality for an incomplete course of antenatal corticosteroids (OR=1.58; 95% CI: 1.2 – 1.78; p =.008), and no effect of gender on mortality over time (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 0.8 – 1.68; p=.15). ELGA infants from our region faced similarly high rates of mortality and major short-term morbidity compared to other Canadian centers. Infants born at 22 and 23 weeks experienced similar survival trajectories, which should be further explored as it may influence clinical perceptions of viability at 22 weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→