Selective Amino Acid-Only in Vivo NMR: A Powerful Tool To Follow Stress Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In vivo NMR of small 13C-enriched aquatic organisms is developing as a powerful tool to detect and explain toxic stress at the biochemical level. Amino acids are a very important category of metabolites for stress detection as they are involved in the vast majority of stress response pathways. As such, they are a useful proxy for stress detection in general, which could then be a trigger for more in-depth analysis of the metabolome. 1H–13C heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) is commonly used to provide additional spectral dispersion in vivo and permit metabolite assignment. While some amino acids can be assigned from HSQC, spectral overlap makes monitoring them in vivo challenging. Here, an experiment typically used to study protein structures is adapted for the selective detection of amino acids inside living Daphnia magna (water fleas). All 20 common amino acids can be selectively detected in both extracts and in vivo. By monitoring bisphenol-A exposure, the in vivo amino acid-only approach identified larger fluxes in a greater number of amino acids when compared to published works using extracts from whole organism homogenates. This suggests that amino acid-only NMR of living organisms may be a very sensitive tool in the detection of stress in vivo and is highly complementary to more traditional metabolomics-based methods. The ability of selective NMR experiments to help researchers to “look inside” living organisms and only detect specific molecules of interest is quite profound and paves the way for the future development of additional targeted experiments for in vivo research and monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".