The Poverty Puddles of the Cage Fishing Community at Limboto Lake Coast, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study analyzed the root causes of poverty in the cage fishing community at Limboto Lake; economic potentials; government programs related to poverty alleviation that has existed along with the causes of failure to exclude the cage fishing community from poverty puddles; and priority ideas from the fishing community that can overcome existing poverty puddles. Data collection was done through observation, interviews, focused group discussion, and literature review. The results showed that there are many aspects of the root causes of the poverty of fishing community at Limboto Lake coastal, namely policies that do not favor fishing community; low quality of human resources; the attitude of fast satisfied fishers; consumptive lifestyle; marketing of fish crops through intermediaries; and natural factors. Meanwhile, the real, local potentials are fisheries potential; crafts of water hyacinth based; lake tourism; the potential of water resources; and the potential for limestone as a raw material for cement. Several government programs related to poverty reduction failed to free the cage fishermen community from the puddle of poverty. Firstly; the program is project-oriented that emphasized the project administration rather than the target of releasing fishers from poverty; secondly, elite dominations, so that sure fishermen elites more enjoy the existing programs on behalf of their community. The priority idea of the fishing community to overcome existing problems is to increase knowledge and skills. Increasing utilization of lake biological resources; open access to domestic and international markets; developing opportunities for alternative economic activities around the lake area; the establishment of a local organization of lake lovers; processing domestic waste, and assisting the business of fish cultivation in Limboto Lake.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".