Level Ekstrak Buah Nanas (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) dan Lama Perendaman Terhadap Kualitas Daging Itik Afkir
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui level ekstrak buah nanas (Ananas comosus L. Merr) dan lama perendaman terhadap kualitas daging itik afkir. Parameter yang diamati adalah pengaruh penambahan ekstrak buah nanas yang mengandung bromelin, lama perendaman dan interaksi antara kedua faktor terhadap susut masak, pH, kadar protein, kadar lemak dan kadar air daging itik afkir. Itik yang digunakan adalah 18 ekor itik Tegal umur 84 minggu. Sampel yang digunakan untuk uji susut masak, pH, kadar air,kadar lemak, dan kadar air adalah daging paha. Rancangan penelitian menggunakan Rancangan Acak Lengkap (RAL) Pola Faktorial 3 × 3, dengan faktor pertama penambahan ekstrak buah nanas (0%, 10%, 20%) dan faktor kedua lama perendaman (15, 30, 45 menit). Terdapat interaksi antara penambahan ekstrak buah nanas dan lama perendaman (P<0,01) pada kadar lemak dan (P<0,05) pada kadar protein. Penambahan ekstrak buah nanas dan lama perendaman dapat meningkatkan kadar protein daging itik afkir dan menurunkan kadar lemak daging itik afkir. Penambahan ekstrak buah nanas 10% dan waktu perendaman 30 menit menghasilkan kualitas daging itik yang terbaik karena mampu menurunkan kadar lemak dan meningkatkan kadar protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it