Incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias in freely moving healthy untreated Sprague-Dawley rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spontaneous arrhythmia characterization in healthy rats can support interpretation when studying novel therapies. Male (n = 55) and female (n = 40) Sprague-Dawley rats with telemetry transmitters for a derivation II ECG. Arrhythmias were assessed from continuous ECG monitoring over a period of 24-48 h, and data analyzed using an automated detection algorithm with 100% manual over-read. While a total of 1825 spontaneous ventricular premature beats (VPB) were identified, only 7 rats (or 7.4%) did not present with any over the recording period. Spontaneous episode(s) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) were noted in males (27%) and females (3%). The incidence of VPB was significantly higher (p < 0.01) during the night time (7 pm-7 am) compared to daytime, while males presented with significantly (p < 0.001) more VPB than females. Most VPB were observed as single ectopic beats, followed by salvos (2 or 3 consecutive VPBs), and VT (i.e. 4 consecutive VPBs). Most VPBs were single premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (57%), while the remaining were escape complexes (43%). Spontaneous premature junctional complexes (PJC) were also observed and were significantly more frequent during the night, and in males. Lastly, 596 episodes of spontaneous 2nd-degree atrioventricular (AV) block were identified and were significantly more frequent during the day time in males. Most 2nd-degree AV block episodes were Mobitz type I (57%), with a significantly (p < 0.05) higher incidence in males. This work emphasizes the importance of obtaining sufficient baseline data when undertaking arrhythmia analysis in safety study and provides a better understanding of both sex- and time- dependent effects of spontaneous arrhythmias in rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".